WholeReach · industry directory
The companies that define the aerospace industry, each read on the same nine-check website rubric — a 0–100 score with the exact fixes — alongside the concepts, the developments and the questions that shape the field.
29 companies in the aerospace industry, each graded on the nine things that decide whether a buyer or an AI assistant can find and trust them online. Open any name for the full write-up and the specific fixes.
| Company | HQ / region | Site score |
|---|---|---|
| CATIA (Dassault Systèmes)www.3ds.com/products/catia | International — Vélizy-Villacoublay, France | 100 0 to fix |
| Ansys (Synopsys) — including STKansys.synopsys.com | US national — Canonsburg, PA; now part of Synopsys | 92 1 to fix |
| Astroboticwww.astrobotic.com | National — Pittsburgh, PA, with a propulsion test facility in Mojave, CA | 92 1 to fix |
| Honeywell Aerospace Technologieswww.honeywellaerospace.com | National — Phoenix, AZ, with facilities worldwide | 92 1 to fix |
| L3Harriswww.l3harris.com | National — Melbourne, FL | 92 1 to fix |
| Lockheed Martinwww.lockheedmartin.com | National — Bethesda, MD, with major Texas operations including F-35 production in Fort Worth and missiles and fire control in Grand Prairie | 92 1 to fix |
| Planet Labswww.planet.com | National — San Francisco, CA | 92 1 to fix |
| Redwirerdw.com | National — Jacksonville, FL, with facilities across multiple states and in Europe | 84 2 to fix |
| Relativity Spacewww.relativityspace.com | National — Long Beach, CA, with engine testing at NASA Stennis in Mississippi | 84 2 to fix |
| Stoke Spacewww.stokespace.com | National — Kent, WA, with testing at Moses Lake, WA and launch site development at Cape Canaveral | 84 2 to fix |
| AST SpaceMobileast-science.com | Texas — headquartered and manufacturing in Midland, TX (West Texas, not the Austin area) | 80 2 to fix |
| AWS Ground Stationaws.amazon.com/ground-station | US national / global antenna network | 80 2 to fix |
| Vantor (formerly Maxar Intelligence)vantor.com | National — Colorado, serving US defense and intelligence customers | 80 2 to fix |
| Palantir Foundrywww.palantir.com/platforms/foundry | US national — Denver, CO | 74 3 to fix |
| Boeingwww.boeing.com/space | National — Arlington, VA, with space operations in Houston, Florida and Alabama | 72 3 to fix |
| KSAT (Kongsberg Satellite Services)www.ksat.no | International — Tromsø, Norway, with polar sites at Svalbard and TrollSat in Antarctica | 72 3 to fix |
| Slingshot Aerospacewww.slingshot.space | US national — El Segundo, CA and Austin, TX | 72 3 to fix |
| Cesiumcesium.com | US national — Philadelphia, PA | 70 3 to fix |
| ICONwww.iconbuild.com | Austin area — headquartered in Austin, TX | 70 3 to fix |
| Northrop Grummanwww.northropgrumman.com | National — Falls Church, VA, with major facilities across the US | 64 4 to fix |
| Axiom Spacewww.axiomspace.com | Texas — Houston, at the Houston Spaceport at Ellington Airport, adjacent to NASA's Johnson Space Center | 62 4 to fix |
| Anduril Industrieswww.anduril.com | National — Costa Mesa, CA, with the Arsenal-1 manufacturing plant in Columbus, OH | 60 4 to fix |
| RTXwww.rtx.com | National — Arlington, VA, with Collins Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney and Raytheon operating across many states | 60 4 to fix |
| Viasatwww.viasat.com | National — Carlsbad, CA | 60 4 to fix |
| BAE Systemswww.baesystems.com | International — London, UK, with a large US arm (BAE Systems Inc.) headquartered in Falls Church, VA | 50 5 to fix |
| United Launch Alliancewww.ulalaunch.com | National — Centennial, CO, with a production facility in Decatur, AL | 47 5 to fix |
| SpaceXwww.spacex.com | Texas — headquartered at Starbase (Boca Chica, Cameron County), with engine and stage testing at McGregor near Waco; major operations in Hawthorne CA and Florida | 42 6 to fix |
| Sierra Spacewww.sierraspace.com | National — Louisville, CO, with facilities in Florida and Wisconsin | 27 7 to fix |
| Intuitive Machineswww.intuitivemachines.com | Texas — Houston, at the Houston Spaceport | 0 9 to fix |
70+ solid 45–69 gaps under 45 costing customers
7 businesses whose website blocked our scanner — common when a site filters datacenter traffic, and not a sign the site is broken. A blocked site is never scored zero.
The firms, funds and institutions that set the terms in aerospace — context, not local listings; never scored.
The principal professional society for aerospace, publishing peer-reviewed journals, running the major technical conferences (SciTech, AVIATION, ASCEND) and developing aerospace standards. AIAA papers and standards are the citable technical references that give aerospace content credibility.
Software-defined defense products — the Lattice command-and-control platform, autonomous surveillance towers, counter-drone systems, loitering munitions and underwater vehicles — funded largely with private capital and sold as products rather than developed under cost-plus contracts. The clearest example of the defense-tech model competing directly with primes.
The dominant engineering simulation stack in aerospace — structural, thermal, CFD, electromagnetics and materials — plus Ansys STK (originally Analytical Graphics Inc.), the standard tool for orbit propagation, mission analysis, coverage, access and space situational awareness. STK screenshots and analyses are what serious space proposals are built on.
Deeply reported, technically literate coverage of launch, NASA politics and program realities, with a long record of getting schedule skepticism right on programs like SLS and Starliner. The place to check whether an announced milestone is real or aspirational.
Building the BlueBird satellites with very large phased-array apertures intended to connect standard unmodified smartphones directly from orbit, in partnership with terrestrial mobile network operators. One of the few large-scale satellite manufacturing operations in Texas, and a case study in how spectrum agreements determine the business.
A CLPS provider building the Peregrine and larger Griffin lunar landers plus rovers and space-power products. Its first Peregrine mission suffered a propellant leak shortly after launch and did not reach the Moon — a useful reference point for how CLPS transfers mission risk to the vendor.
Rented antenna contacts scheduled by the minute, with downlinked data landing directly in cloud storage for immediate processing. Together with commercial network operators it removed the need for a satellite operator to build and staff its own global ground segment — one of the largest structural cost changes in the industry.
Flying private astronaut missions to the ISS and building modules intended to attach to the station and later detach as a free-flying commercial station, plus developing the next-generation lunar spacesuit under a NASA award. Its Houston location is deliberate — it draws directly on the Johnson Space Center human-spaceflight workforce.
Combat aircraft, naval systems, electronic warfare and, following its acquisition of Ball Aerospace, a substantial US space business in remote sensing instruments, spacecraft and radiation-hardened electronics. A reminder that some of the most important space suppliers are foreign-parented US subsidiaries operating under special security agreements.
New Shepard for suborbital human and research flights, New Glenn as its heavy-lift orbital vehicle, BE-4 engines that also power ULA's Vulcan, and the Blue Moon lunar lander under NASA's Human Landing System program. Its West Texas site makes it one of the few companies with a Texas launch presence outside Starbase.
Commercial airliners plus the Space Launch System core stage, the Starliner crew capsule, ISS sustainment work run largely out of Houston, satellites, and defense aircraft. Its recent program troubles — Starliner in particular — are a widely cited case study in fixed-price development risk.
Administers the Export Administration Regulations and the Commerce Control List, including the 9x515 ECCNs that cover most commercial satellites and related components moved off the USML. Publishes the Entity List and end-user controls that determine who a supplier may sell to.
The traditional backbone of airframe and large-structure design, now delivered on the 3DEXPERIENCE platform with model-based systems engineering, composites design and surface modeling. Aerospace primes commonly dictate CATIA compatibility to their supply chains, so it functions as an interoperability requirement, not just a tool choice.
Open-source CesiumJS and the Cesium platform for accurate 3D globe and time-dynamic visualization, with the 3D Tiles standard behind much of the industry's geospatial rendering. The default way space and defense applications put orbits, sensor footprints and terrain in front of a non-specialist user.
Funds high-risk, high-payoff programs across space, autonomy, hypersonics, novel propulsion and in-space assembly, typically through short, milestone-driven agreements. A DARPA program is often the first non-dilutive money a hard-technology aerospace startup can win.
Administers ITAR and the US Munitions List, handles registration, licensing, agreements (TAAs and MLAs), commodity jurisdiction determinations and voluntary disclosures. This is the office that decides whether a spacecraft capability may be described publicly at all, which makes it the single most consequential authority for aerospace website and marketing content.
Licenses and regulates every US commercial launch, reentry and launch site under 14 CFR Part 450, covering public safety analysis, flight safety systems, environmental review and financial responsibility. Nothing launches without AST, its licensing timelines are a material business risk, and its rulemaking is actively contested by industry — cite it directly rather than paraphrasing.
Licenses US satellite systems and earth stations, allocates and enforces spectrum use, and imposes orbital-debris mitigation conditions including the five-year post-mission disposal rule. For any communications or remote-sensing operator, FCC authorization is as gating as the launch license.
The Austin-area anchor of the Texas space industry. Firefly describes Alpha as the only operational US rocket in the 1,000 kg class, is developing the larger reusable Eclipse vehicle with Northrop Grumman, and states that Blue Ghost is the first and only commercial spacecraft to successfully land and operate on the Moon after its March 2025 lunar landing. It went public on Nasdaq in 2025 and has additional NASA CLPS missions under contract. For any Central Texas aerospace supplier or service firm, Firefly is the nearest large customer and the nearest large employer competitor.
Combat vehicles, nuclear submarines, Gulfstream business jets and, through General Dynamics Mission Systems, satellite ground systems, secure communications and space payload electronics. The mission-systems arm is the relevant one for space and defense electronics work.
Flight-deck avionics, auxiliary power units, engines, navigation and inertial systems, connectivity and space components including radiation-hardened electronics and inertial measurement units. Its content is on a very large share of the world's aircraft, making it the reference point for certified avionics.
An Austin construction-technology company printing homes and structures at scale, whose government and off-world line targets lunar and planetary surface construction. It has received NASA funding to develop off-world construction technology, making it the unusual case of an Austin building-technology company competing for space programs — and a natural local content angle for a Central Texas aerospace audience.
A NASA Commercial Lunar Payload Services provider whose Nova-C landers have reached the lunar surface, though both landings ended with the vehicle tipped over. Also holds work on lunar relay communications and navigation infrastructure. Publicly traded and one of the two anchor commercial space companies in the Houston corridor.
Operates a cross-linked LEO constellation providing truly global voice, data and IoT connectivity including over the poles, plus a certified aviation safety service and government services under a dedicated DoD gateway. The incumbent that the direct-to-device newcomers are trying to displace at the low-bandwidth end.
Vehicle classes from smallsat launchers to super-heavy, dedicated versus rideshare, cost per kilogram, cadence and manifest slots, launch site availability, and the Part 450 licensing process. This is the highest-intent pillar because launch is the gating cost and schedule item for almost every space program.
The split between the bus (power, propulsion, attitude control, thermal, comms) and the payload (imager, transponder, sensor, science instrument), plus form factors from cubesat to GEO-class, integration flow, and who supplies what. The vocabulary most buyers need before they can scope a program.
Building and operating many satellites as a system — orbital planes, revisit rate, inter-satellite links, ground station networks, downlink capacity, tasking and the analytics layer that turns raw pixels or packets into a product customers buy.
Space Force and Space Systems Command missions, proliferated architectures, missile warning and tracking, resilient PNT, launch for national security payloads, and how a commercial company positions against traditional primes for defense work.
The most consequential compliance topic in aerospace marketing. USML categories, DDTC registration, ECCNs and the Commerce Control List, deemed export, TAAs and MLAs, foreign-person restrictions, and a practical standard for what technical detail is safe on a public website, in a data sheet, at a trade show or in a job req.
How money actually flows: cost-plus versus firm-fixed-price, OTAs and prototype-to-production paths, SBIR and STTR, IDIQ vehicles and task orders, set-asides, protests, teaming and subcontracting, and the difference between a demo and a program of record.
AS9100 for aerospace quality management, NADCAP accreditation for special processes, DO-178C and DO-254 for airborne software and complex hardware, counterfeit-parts controls, first article inspection and configuration management. In this industry certification status is a gate, not a differentiator.
Thermal vacuum, vibration and acoustic, shock, EMI/EMC, radiation and outgassing — plus the qualification-versus-acceptance distinction, protoflight approaches, and how test campaigns drive schedule and cost more than design work does.
Liquid, solid, hybrid and electric propulsion, specific impulse and delta-v budgets, staging, engine test campaigns, and how booster recovery and reuse have restructured launch pricing and the whole downstream business case.
ISS operations and its planned retirement, commercial LEO destinations, private astronaut missions, life support and crew systems, EVA suits, and the Houston-centered ecosystem that supports all of it.
Artemis and CLPS lunar deliveries, landers and rovers, in-space manufacturing, satellite servicing and refueling, debris removal, and the surface-construction work that connects terrestrial construction technology to off-world programs.
Starbase and McGregor, the Austin-metro cluster around Firefly, the Houston corridor around Johnson Space Center and the Houston Spaceport, AST SpaceMobile in Midland, the Texas Space Commission and its SEARF grants, and the university pipelines at UT Austin and Texas A&M. Concrete local proof beats generic industry content for any Texas aerospace business.
Precision machining, forgings and castings, composites, additive manufacturing for flight hardware, harnessing and connectors, radiation-tolerant electronics, long-lead materials, and the sole-source and capacity chokepoints that dominate program risk conversations.
Security clearance levels and timelines, US-person requirements driven by ITAR, the shortage of experienced aerospace machinists, test engineers and mission operators, apprenticeship and university pipelines, and how a company recruits credibly against SpaceX-scale employers.
The atmospheric half of aerospace — type certificates and STCs, PMA parts, airworthiness, avionics architectures and certification, sustainment and depot maintenance, and the defense aviation programs that fund much of the supplier base.
How space companies are financed and valued — venture and growth rounds, SPACs and traditional IPOs, government funding as de-risking capital, backlog and book-to-bill, program milestones as value inflection points, and the honest economics behind headline contract announcements.
explain that ITAR controls defense articles and technical data on the US Munitions List and that applicability turns on your specific hardware and data; point to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls rather than making a jurisdiction call
contrast the State Department's munitions-list regime with Commerce's dual-use Commerce Control List, and say that many space components moved between them -- so classification, not assumption, decides
define it as releasing controlled technical data to a foreign person inside the United States, and note that this is why hiring and lab access are export-control questions
answer the mechanism: marketing descriptions are generally fine, controlled technical data is not, and the public-domain and fundamental-research exclusions are narrower than people assume -- route it through your empowered official
technical data is information required for design, development, production or use -- drawings, ICDs, test data; performance summaries and capability statements usually are not, but the line is drawn by the company's own review
explain that manufacturers, exporters and brokers of defense articles must register regardless of whether they ever export; cite DDTC for the current fee and process
describe a Technical Assistance Agreement as the authorisation for sharing controlled technical data with foreign parties, and note the lead time it adds to any international program
explain that AS9100 is the aerospace quality management standard built on ISO 9001 with added requirements on configuration, counterfeit parts and risk
describe it as accreditation for special processes such as heat treat, welding, NDT and coatings, and explain that primes require it because those processes cannot be verified by inspecting the finished part
qualification proves the design survives beyond expected environments; acceptance proves this particular unit was built right -- confusing the two is a common and expensive error
explain thermal vacuum as the closest ground analogue to orbit, and why workmanship defects surface there rather than in ambient testing
technology readiness measures whether it works; manufacturing readiness measures whether you can build it repeatably -- programs fail on the second more often than the first
describe it as the vehicle operator licence covering launch or reentry safety, and note that spaceport, environmental and airspace approvals are separate; point to the FAA's commercial space licensing pages
explain the FCC's post-mission disposal requirement for low-Earth-orbit satellites and say that it makes end-of-life propellant a design input, not an afterthought
the bus provides power, attitude control, thermal and comms; the payload is the thing the mission exists for -- and the interface between them is where most schedule risk lives
explain what drives price -- mass, orbit, rideshare against dedicated, schedule certainty and separation system -- and point to published operator pricing rather than quoting a figure
Get your free website score and the exact list of what to fix — no charge, no pitch. Claim your listing or ask for the full report.